Choosing a tour/commuter bike!
Apr. 27th, 2010 09:01 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
Hi,
I'm looking at getting a decent long-range bike. The companies that make the bikes are...
In no order of preference. I'm looking for a bike that won't break down randomly, is comfortable, and goes decently fast, and isn't going to cost an arm and a leg. Does anyone have experience with these companies?
I'm looking at getting a decent long-range bike. The companies that make the bikes are...
- Raleigh
- Kona
- Giant
- Specialized
- Trek
- Gary Fisher
In no order of preference. I'm looking for a bike that won't break down randomly, is comfortable, and goes decently fast, and isn't going to cost an arm and a leg. Does anyone have experience with these companies?
no subject
Date: 2010-04-27 04:57 pm (UTC)It is, aside from the toe-into-wheel problem, very comfy, and works well for me as an all-purpose bike: something I can haul groceries and commute on, and take out on the weekends and do half-centuries in the summertime.
Were I buying another touring bike and wanting something that one could buy built out from a bike shop, I would also look at Fujis and Surlys.
no subject
Date: 2010-04-27 07:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-04-27 07:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-04-27 07:58 pm (UTC)I was just doing a bunch of reading about it, so the name was on the tip of my fingers.
no subject
Date: 2010-04-27 08:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-04-27 07:24 pm (UTC)Things I liked:
- Light and fast, OMG.
- Comfy for me.
- The 47-cm frame seems to fit me well.
Things I did not like:
-Shimano Ultegra shifters are too big for my hands, and I will miss the brakes and die on a hill somewhere. (Yes, I can replace the shifters with bar-end shifters, and I may do that if I decide to buy this bike; I have not yet decided to buy this bike, because I wish to try more bikes).
Definitely look at Surlys.
I've ridden Giants for the past 10 years, and found them comfy and pretty durable; however, I definitely found that the durability improved in the more expensive bikes. I did not try their touring models, because the same bike guy who has sold me two Giants recommended the Specialized, so I trusted him. However, if you're starting from scratch, by all means try out some Giants. I've liked their geometry in the past.
That's all I got. More as I try more bikes!
My list includes a small frame without toe-overlap and shifters that don't stretch my hands (I have small hands); otherwise, it looks a lot like yours.
no subject
Date: 2010-04-27 09:47 pm (UTC)Geometry & frame stuff is stuff I want to focus on with the bike shop, since it's so individual. What I'm primarily concerned about is getting a weaker bike than otherwise. IE, the toe-overlap mentioned above seems like a design problem.
no subject
Date: 2010-04-27 10:10 pm (UTC)Apparently toe-overlap is more frequently a problem when bike makers shrink the frame, but keep the 700 cc wheels. This happens most with frames marketed to women (and some smaller men); it's worth checking for if you ride a bigger frame, but tends to happen less.
Some of us, though, need to ride smaller frames, on account of being, well, smaller.
It's worth making sure your LBS has someone on staff who has proper training in bicycle fitting, and can work with you to make sure you get the frame and geometry that are right for you. I think Trek puts their dealers through pretty extensive training, and I know Specialized has a bike fit program for their dealers, so dealers who deal in those bikes are likely to have had some training in addition to working at a bike shop.
My Giant Sedona DX is built like a tank. It is also ridiculously heavy and slow. But it has withstood several years of commuting, Toronto weather, off-road adventures, and being packed and shipped to Ottawa. So I would say that Giant's frames do not lack in robustness, but, as I said above, I have not tried their lighter models.
no subject
Date: 2010-04-27 10:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-04-30 06:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2010-04-27 11:01 pm (UTC)One vote for Kona ...
Date: 2010-04-28 11:37 am (UTC)It seems to be a very good bike for this sort of riding - I can ride on road, bike paths, even off-path (although gravel is still scary !), and the wide-ish tyres handle it well. The gear range is awesome - triple chainring at the front (52/40/30), and a wide-range cluster at the back (11-34) means that I haven't yet met a hill that has defeated me or my ageing knees. Also has attachment points for panniers, very handy for commuting.
Pretty low maintenance, too, I've had one wheel trued, and replaced the rear cluster and chain earlier this year (after the first 5500km), and apart from occasionally oiling the chain and wiping off some of the grime, I don't spend much time tinkering with it.
Finally, as for "decently fast", it all depends on the rider, obviously :-)
But I can usually keep up with (or pass) other cyclists I see on my commute, and usually cruise along at 25-30km/h (on a somewhat hilly route, with lots of traffic lights, often heavy traffic, and sometimes trams to contend with).
(I'm planning to use this bike for Around the Bay in a Day this October, I'm sure it'll be fun)